DSpace Repository

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Olerud-Molander Ankle Score in Patients With Malleolar Fracture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Büker, N.
dc.contributor.author Şavkın, R.
dc.contributor.author Gökalp, O.
dc.contributor.author Ök, N.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-16T12:57:00Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-16T12:57:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.issn 10672516 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/8858
dc.description.abstract The present study was planned to translate and culturally adapt the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the OMAS in patients with surgically treated malleolar fracture. The OMAS was adapted for use in Turkish by first translating it and then back-translating it in accordance with published guidelines. The final Turkish version of the OMAS was administered to 91 patients participating in the present study. The OMAS questionnaire was repeated 7 days later to assess test–retest reliability. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was used for each question's score and the total score, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for test–retest reliability. The internal consistency of the OMAS-TR was assessed using Cronbach's α. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the OMAS with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and global self-rating function (GSRF). The GSRF has 5 options: very good, good, fair, poor, and very poor. These are assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Before validity analysis, the GSRF score was reduced to 3 groups. In the test–retest reliability assessment, the OMAS showed high correlation (r = 0.882). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.942. Cronbach's α was 0.762 and 0.731 at days 1 and 7 (adequate internal consistency). The correlation coefficients versus the 5 subscales of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score ranged from r = 0.753 to r = 0.809 (p =.000) and versus the GSRF was r = −0.794 (p =.000). According to results of the present study, the Turkish version of the OMAS demonstrated adequate test–retest reliability, excellent internal consistency, and evidence of validity for Turkish-speaking patients treated surgically for ankle fracture. © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Academic Press Inc.
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.002
dc.subject ankle
dc.subject malleolus
dc.subject OMAS
dc.subject reliability
dc.subject validity
dc.subject adult
dc.subject Article
dc.subject controlled study
dc.subject female
dc.subject fracture treatment
dc.subject human
dc.subject Likert scale
dc.subject major clinical study
dc.subject male
dc.subject malleolus fracture
dc.subject musculoskeletal disease assessment
dc.subject Olerud Molander Ankle Score
dc.subject scoring system
dc.subject self concept
dc.subject ankle fracture
dc.subject case control study
dc.subject classification
dc.subject injury scale
dc.subject middle aged
dc.subject publication
dc.subject questionnaire
dc.subject reproducibility
dc.subject self report
dc.subject validation study
dc.subject young adult
dc.subject Adult
dc.subject Ankle Fractures
dc.subject Case-Control Studies
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Reproducibility of Results
dc.subject Self Report
dc.subject Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject Translations
dc.subject Trauma Severity Indices
dc.subject Turkey
dc.subject Young Adult
dc.title Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Olerud-Molander Ankle Score in Patients With Malleolar Fracture
dc.type Article
dc.relation.journal Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
dc.identifier.volume 56
dc.identifier.issue 6
dc.identifier.startpage 1209
dc.identifier.endpage 1212
dc.identifier.index Scopus

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record