DSpace Repository

Comparative evaluation of two different volumes of lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ulus, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.author Gürses, Ercan Lütfi
dc.contributor.author Öztürk, İbrahim
dc.contributor.author Serin, Simay
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-16T12:33:28Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-16T12:33:28Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.issn 1234-1010
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7919
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889547
dc.description.abstract Background: This study was conducted to compare low concentration-high volume intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) method with local anesthetic method in upper extremity surgery in terms of efficiency and adverse effects. Material/Methods: Thirty-nine patients were divided into 2 groups; the first group received a 2% concentration of 12-15 mL lidocaine (Group 1) and the second group received a 0.5% concentration of 30-50 mL lidocaine (Group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic data of patients (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation- SpO2) was recorded before and after anesthesia at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 40 minutes. Results: The intergroup and intragroup comparisons did not reveal any significant differences in hemodynamic data. The onset time of sensorial block was shorter and the regression time of sensorial block was longer in Group 1 than Group 2. Group 1 had shorter onset time of motor block and longer regression time of motor block than Group 2. There were no significant differences between the study groups in terms of the time of tourniquet and postoperative analgesia time. Conclusions: IVRA technique applied with 2% concentration and volume of 12-15 mL lidocaine may be suggested as a safe option. © Med Sci Monit, 2013. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Medical Science Monitor en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Intravenous en_US
dc.subject Lidocaine en_US
dc.subject Regional anesthesia en_US
dc.subject lidocaine en_US
dc.subject midazolam en_US
dc.subject opiate en_US
dc.subject adult en_US
dc.subject aged en_US
dc.subject article en_US
dc.subject clinical article en_US
dc.subject controlled study en_US
dc.subject crystalloid en_US
dc.subject diastolic blood pressure en_US
dc.subject exsanguination en_US
dc.subject female en_US
dc.subject heart rate en_US
dc.subject hemodynamic parameters en_US
dc.subject human en_US
dc.subject intravenous regional anesthesia en_US
dc.subject male en_US
dc.subject oxygen saturation en_US
dc.subject postoperative analgesia en_US
dc.subject postoperative pain en_US
dc.subject systolic blood pressure en_US
dc.subject tourniquet en_US
dc.subject visual analog scale en_US
dc.subject Anesthesia, Conduction en_US
dc.subject Anesthesia, Intravenous en_US
dc.subject Arm en_US
dc.subject Dose-Response Relationship, Drug en_US
dc.subject Hemodynamics en_US
dc.subject Humans en_US
dc.subject Statistics, Nonparametric en_US
dc.subject Time Factors en_US
dc.subject Turkey en_US
dc.title Comparative evaluation of two different volumes of lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.volume 19 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 978
dc.identifier.startpage 978 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 983 en_US
dc.authorid 0000-0001-9401-7812
dc.identifier.doi 10.12659/MSM.889547
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 24220662 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84887789683 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000326876400001 en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record