DSpace Repository

Comparison of emg biofeedback and johnstone pressure splints in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kitiş, Ali
dc.contributor.author Kayihan, H.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-16T12:05:55Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-16T12:05:55Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.issn 1302-0234
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6317
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4274/tftr.56.116
dc.description.abstract Objective: This study was carried out to compare Johnstone pressure splints and electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback in addition to neurodevelopmental therapy on activities of daily living, sensory perception and motor integration functions, functional hand activities, and muscle tone in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP). Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, whose motor development levels were similar, were included in this study and were divided into two groups. In addition to Bobath's neurodevelopmental therapy, Group I was treated with pressure splints for the upper extremity and Group II-with EMG biofeedback training, also applied to the upper extremity, three times a week for three months. In the biofeedback group the session length was 20 minutes and in the Johnstone group, it was 50 minutes in total, with and without splinting. Patients were evaluated for muscle tone, activities of daily living, sensory perception and motor integration functions, and functional hand activities before and after therapy, and on the third and sixth months following therapy. Results: At the third and sixth months after treatment, significant improvement was found in muscle tone, activities of daily living, sensory perception and motor integration functions, and functional hand activities (p<0.05). Moreover, the findings in Group I were more significant than those in Group II (p<0.001). Conclusion: These results show that both treatment methods are helpful to Bobath approach in cerebral palsy rehabilitation. However, EMG biofeedback treatment is more effective due to the fact that it encourages the child's active participation. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2010;56:116-23. © Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Cerebral palsy en_US
dc.subject EMG biofeedback en_US
dc.subject Johnstone pressure splints en_US
dc.subject article en_US
dc.subject cerebral palsy en_US
dc.subject child en_US
dc.subject clinical article en_US
dc.subject daily life activity en_US
dc.subject electromyography en_US
dc.subject hand movement en_US
dc.subject human en_US
dc.subject johnstone pressure splint en_US
dc.subject motor development en_US
dc.subject muscle tone en_US
dc.subject sensorimotor integration en_US
dc.subject sensory deprivation en_US
dc.subject splinting en_US
dc.title Comparison of emg biofeedback and johnstone pressure splints in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.volume 56 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 116
dc.identifier.startpage 116 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 123 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.4274/tftr.56.116
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-78249264135 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000282599500005 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record