DSpace Repository

Tearing properties of upholstery flocked fabrics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bilisik, K.
dc.contributor.author Turhan, Yıldıray
dc.contributor.author Demiryurek, O.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-16T12:04:36Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-16T12:04:36Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 00405175 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/6153
dc.description.abstract We have studied the tearing strength of substrate woven fabric, substrate with adhesive, flocked fabric and washed flocked fabric on dry and wet conditions. The tensile strength of the rubbed flocked fabric and rubbed washed flocked fabrics in dry and wet conditions were also researched, and a statistical model was developed for the analysis of the tearing behavior of these fabric forms. Warp and weft tearing strengths of rubbed flocked fabric and rubbed washed flocked fabric in wet conditions were slightly higher than those in dry conditions. The reason was partly the high wet strength characteristic of cotton fiber and partly the lubrication effect of acrylic adhesive under wet conditions. Although the weft density of the substrate fabric was around half of its warp density, there was a small difference between warp and weft tearing strengths of dry and wet states of rubbed flocked fabric. This was attributed to the dense structure having less free space and less ultimate deformation potential and ultimately reducing the tearing strength. When the stroke number increased, the warp and weft tearing strengths of dry and wet states of rubbed flocked fabric generally decreased. It was also found that the stroke number of wet rubbed flocked fabric and rubbed washed flocked fabric was low in comparison with stroke number of dry rubbed flocked fabric and rubbed washed flocked fabric. The reason was that the wet acrylic adhesive had poor properties. The results from the regression model were compared with the measured values mainly by the mean absolute percent error parameter which enables us to conclude that the developed regression equations explain the tearing strength of flocked fabrics. © 2011, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.
dc.language.iso English
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1177/0040517510380784
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject dry and wet tearing strength
dc.subject Flocked fabrics
dc.subject substrate fabric
dc.subject substrate with adhesive
dc.subject token rubbing test
dc.subject Acrylic adhesives
dc.subject Deformation potential
dc.subject Dense structures
dc.subject Dry and wet
dc.subject Dry and wet conditions
dc.subject Dry condition
dc.subject Error parameters
dc.subject Fabric form
dc.subject Free space
dc.subject Lubrication effect
dc.subject Regression equation
dc.subject Regression model
dc.subject Statistical models
dc.subject Tearing strength
dc.subject Wet conditions
dc.subject Wet strength
dc.subject Woven fabrics
dc.subject Cotton fibers
dc.subject Curing
dc.subject Lubrication
dc.subject Regression analysis
dc.subject Substrates
dc.subject Tensile strength
dc.subject Cotton
dc.subject Forming Fabrics
dc.subject Regression Analysis
dc.subject Tear Strength
dc.subject Tensile Strength
dc.title Tearing properties of upholstery flocked fabrics
dc.type Article
dc.relation.journal Textile Research Journal
dc.identifier.volume 81
dc.identifier.issue 3
dc.identifier.startpage 290
dc.identifier.endpage 300
dc.relation.publicationCategory Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.identifier.index Scopus
dc.identifier.index WOS


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record